Page history
21 April 2006
wikipedia>CBDunkerson
Protected Template:Infobox: Contents of page still disputed. Restoring protection and instituting straw poll. [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
mwikipedia>Netoholic
rmv conditionals. this is a _basic_ template for new template editors. Conditionals are not _basic_ tools.
−419
wikipedia>Marknew
Restored Usage instructions (none available on the talk page)
+610
19 April 2006
wikipedia>Marknew
attempt number 2...
m−27
wikipedia>Marknew
Replace data5 "hack" with something clearer that *appears* to work in the same way.
−10
wikipedia>The editor1
no edit summary
wikipedia>The editor1
no edit summary
−27
wikipedia>The editor1
no edit summary
+81
wikipedia>Freakofnurture
cleanup, convert qif to #if:
−662
18 April 2006
wikipedia>CBDunkerson
Removed protection - assume #if: has resolved the dispute
−36
wikipedia>CBDunkerson
Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting - hopefully #if: has resolved the dispute by superceding both methods
m
19 February 2006
wikipedia>Jtkiefer
protected
+36
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected
+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals
−487
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox
+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
rvt to less complex code
−487
16 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original
m+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors
−487
14 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - it is for me if it is for you
m+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
reverting this "at will" is not an option.
−487
13 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
+487
wikipedia>Trödel
The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that
−487
12 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk
−487
11 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel
m+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
we had a compromise, see talk
−234
wikipedia>Netoholic
we had a compromise, see talk
−253
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN
m+253
10 February 2006
6 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
m+487
wikipedia>Netoholic
Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
−134
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - sigh
+97
wikipedia>Trödel
including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them
−97
5 February 2006
4 February 2006
wikipedia>WGFinley
rv - and still no consensus to do it
−450
wikipedia>Crotalus horridus
Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification.
+450
wikipedia>WGFinley
rv
m−450
wikipedia>Crotalus horridus
um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have.
+450
3 February 2006
wikipedia>WGFinley
rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage
m−450
wikipedia>Crotalus horridus
Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups
+450
wikipedia>Netoholic
rvt, this is Infobox 101
−450
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus
m+450
wikipedia>Trödel
using conditionals should not be taught to new users
−450
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt per talk
m+450
wikipedia>Netoholic
using conditionals sets a bad example for new template creators
−450
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt as per talk
m+450
wikipedia>Trödel
remove conditional instructions
−450
1 February 2006
wikipedia>Locke Cole
rvt - consensus is on talk
m+450
wikipedia>Trödel
remove conditionals until concensus on method and whether to even include them at all is reached
−450
wikipedia>Ta bu shi da yu
Oops. Unintentional rollback - apologies to all, this was a mistake.
+450
